Welcome
Welcome to The Beatles Forum Join and have fun talking to other Beatlemaniacs

Paul McCartney: ' I politicised The Beatles'

Forum for all Paul McCartney related topics

Moderator: Dark Phoenyx

Paul McCartney: ' I politicised The Beatles'

Postby GlassOnion on Mon Dec 15, 2008 3:35 am

Go here to read it.
http://www.nme.com/news/the-beatles/41638

Paul McCartney has said that he was responsible for politicising The Beatles.

He claims he had a meeting with philosopher Bertrand Russell in the 1960s and that triggered the band’s politicisation.

"We sort of stumbled into things," he told the journal Prospect. "For instance, Vietnam. Just when we were getting to be well known, someone said to me: 'Bertrand Russell is living not far from here in Chelsea, why don't you go and see him?' and so I just took a taxi down there and knocked on the door."

"He was fabulous. He told me about the Vietnam war – most of us didn't know about it, it wasn't yet in the papers – and also that it was a very bad war.

"I remember going back to the studio either that evening or the next day and telling the guys, particularly John [Lennon], about this meeting and saying what a bad war this was."

It had previously been accepted that Lennon was the political driving force behind the band and Tariq Ali, a former leader of Britain's anti-war movement, has disputed McCartney's claims.

He told The Sunday Times: "This is news to me. We never heard of Paul's views at the time. It was John Lennon who was concerned about the war. He never mentioned McCartney and I never thought of asking him to join us."
User avatar
GlassOnion
Media Admin
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:21 am
Location: USA

Postby Honey_Tree on Mon Dec 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Thanks for the info, Glassie.

It's interesting.... I wouldn't have thought that Paul was the political one. i mean, sure he may have gone to Bertrand Russel and told John about the Vietnam War and gave John the idea, but I don't think he can say that he was the one who Politicised the Beatles. And besides, (and I am trying to remember here) in most interviews - wasn't it John who gave the political view?


Have you read the comments after the article? Geez, some people :roll:
~*~SmAlL StEpS HoNeY~*~
Sorted! Sorted! it's bloody top mad for it!
User avatar
Honey_Tree
Beatles Forum Admin
 
Posts: 798
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:39 am
Location: New Zealand

Postby sonne on Wed Dec 17, 2008 1:53 am

Paul was always the businessman. It might sound terrible but maybe not, like he saw a way of promoting The Beatles by this war through peace and love whilst at the same time genuinely wanting to bring the plight to the public for the greater good, for that sake of peace and love?

I think it was a wise move anyway.
User avatar
sonne
Other Stuff Admin
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:02 pm

Postby Honey_Tree on Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:07 pm

But I think the debate here, is whether he did it or not, as in whether he is just saying it now...
~*~SmAlL StEpS HoNeY~*~
Sorted! Sorted! it's bloody top mad for it!
User avatar
Honey_Tree
Beatles Forum Admin
 
Posts: 798
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:39 am
Location: New Zealand

Postby GlassOnion on Thu Dec 18, 2008 2:24 am

Yeah he could just be saying it never know.
User avatar
GlassOnion
Media Admin
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:21 am
Location: USA

Postby GlassOnion on Thu Dec 18, 2008 2:26 am

Yeah he could just be saying it never know.
User avatar
GlassOnion
Media Admin
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:21 am
Location: USA


Return to Paul Mccartney

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron