Hi all

Difficult hypothetical question for you guys ...

If you HAD to remove ONE of the Beatles and have him replaced by any other artist, who would you remove and who would you replace him with?

Me personally, hmm its tough (Almost Blasphemy!) but i'd get rid of Ringo Starr and replace him with Keith Moon.

Go on, share your decision if you have the nerve

Thanks

Scott

http://www.rarebeatlesmemorabilia.com/Beatles Memorabilia
http://rarebeatlesmemorabilia.com/blog/Beatles Memorabilia Blog

interesting question.... I will have to think about that.... which may take time....

I know for sure Octie will disagree with you....

You know Ringo Starr his son Zack well he played in The Who then Oasis now Who again. We could replace Ringo with his son or yeah Keith Moon. The others couldn't be replaced.

Oh. Gosh. Wow. Well..... Hmm.

Honey_Tree wrote:I know for sure Octie will disagree with you....

... definitely Ringo stays on board as far as I'm concerned

Hm... my opinion goes something like this: I'd say NONE of them could be replaced, because if one of them goes, it's not The Beatles anymore. To my mind (and ears), Ringo is as much an irreplaceable part of The Beatles as John. Paul or George They all fitted perfectly, in my opinion. And I suppose it can be fun thinking about different line-up combination and all that, but if I had to replace one of them.... I honestly wouldn't (call me nerve-less! ).

Oh, I forgot to say... Welcome to the forums Beatles Memorabilia! Hope you have fun 'round here

You go Octie!

I liked my answer on DM: replace them with eachother and vice versa!

We cant call you nerveless Octie, you are not John!

If anyone of them is removed, they wouldn't be The Beatles anymore.... I can't imagine the Rolling Stones without Mick Jagger or The Doors without Jim Morrison...

i'd remove Pete Best and replace him with Ringo Starr.

sonne wrote:i'd remove Pete Best and replace him with Ringo Starr.

That is a good one

Clever man, Sonne

probably

Funny man too